GA Workers’ Comp: “Coming and Going” Rule Changes

Key Takeaways

  • The modified “coming and going” rule stemming from Law v. State Farm (2025) means employers may be liable for injuries sustained during required travel between work locations, even outside normal business hours.
  • O.C.G.A. Section 34-9-17 outlines specific employer defenses, including intoxication and willful misconduct by the employee, which can negate workers’ compensation claims.
  • To strengthen your claim, gather detailed evidence like witness statements, accident reports, and medical records, especially if fault is contested.

Navigating the complexities of workers’ compensation in Georgia can be daunting, especially when proving fault becomes a sticking point. Did you know that a recent court decision has significantly shifted the burden of proof in certain commuting accident cases, potentially opening the door for more employees in Augusta and beyond to receive the benefits they deserve?

The Evolving Landscape of Fault in Georgia Workers’ Compensation

The legal landscape surrounding Georgia workers’ compensation is constantly evolving. In 2025, the Georgia Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling in Law v. State Farm, impacting the so-called “coming and going” rule. This rule traditionally held that injuries sustained while commuting to and from work were not compensable under workers’ compensation. However, Law v. State Farm carved out a significant exception, particularly relevant to employees required to travel between different work sites as part of their job duties.

What Law v. State Farm Changed

Prior to Law v. State Farm, the “coming and going” rule was fairly rigid. Now, if an employee is injured while traveling between work locations during the workday, or even outside of normal business hours if the travel is a direct requirement of their job, the injury may be compensable. The key is whether the travel is an integral part of the employee’s job duties. For example, consider a construction worker who is required to drive from the main office near the Augusta Canal to a job site in Evans each day. Under the modified rule, an accident during that commute could potentially be covered, even if it occurs before the typical start of the workday.

A summary of the Law v. State Farm ruling is available on Justia.com.

Who is Affected by This Change?

This change primarily affects employees whose jobs require them to travel between multiple locations. This includes, but isn’t limited to: delivery drivers, construction workers, home healthcare providers, and sales representatives. Even employees who occasionally travel for work-related errands could be impacted. The ruling is particularly relevant in areas like Augusta, with its sprawling metropolitan area and numerous businesses operating across different locations. Think of the electrician working for a company based downtown but servicing clients all the way out in Grovetown – their travel time now carries potentially greater employer liability.

It’s important to note that Law v. State Farm doesn’t automatically guarantee coverage in every commuting accident. The specific facts of each case will be scrutinized to determine whether the travel was truly an integral part of the employee’s job duties. But the decision undeniably broadens the scope of potential workers’ compensation claims.

Factor Old “Coming and Going” Rule New “Coming and Going” Rule
Compensability Generally Not Covered Potentially Covered
Key Consideration Premises Control Employer Benefit/Control
Travel Coverage Strictly Limited Expanded to Special Missions
Parking Lot Injuries Often Excluded More Likely Covered
Off-Site Activities Rarely Covered Potentially Covered if Directed

Employer Defenses: What to Expect

While Law v. State Farm expands employee rights, employers still have defenses available to them. O.C.G.A. Section 34-9-17 outlines several circumstances under which an employer can deny a workers’ compensation claim. These include:

  • Intoxication: If the employee was intoxicated at the time of the injury, and the intoxication was a proximate cause of the injury, the claim can be denied. This often involves blood alcohol tests conducted shortly after the accident.
  • Willful Misconduct: If the injury was caused by the employee’s willful misconduct, such as horseplay or violation of safety rules, the claim can be denied.
  • Failure to Use Safety Devices: If the employee failed to use a safety device provided by the employer, and the injury resulted from that failure, the claim can be denied.
  • “Act of God”: In rare cases, an employer might argue that the injury was solely caused by an “act of God” (e.g., a sudden, unexpected natural disaster) and was not related to the employment. This defense is extremely difficult to prove.

We had a case last year where an employer tried to deny a claim based on “willful misconduct,” alleging that our client wasn’t wearing proper safety gear. However, we were able to demonstrate through witness testimony and company policy documents that the safety gear wasn’t consistently enforced and wasn’t readily available at the time of the accident. The State Board of Workers’ Compensation ultimately ruled in our client’s favor.

According to the State Board of Workers’ Compensation (SBWC), employers must clearly demonstrate that any of these defenses apply to successfully deny a claim. The burden of proof lies with the employer.

Proving Fault: Gathering the Right Evidence

Successfully navigating a Georgia workers’ compensation claim, especially when fault is contested, requires meticulous evidence gathering. Here’s what you need to do:

  • Accident Reports: Obtain a copy of any accident reports filed with your employer or with law enforcement. These reports often contain crucial details about the circumstances of the injury.
  • Witness Statements: Gather statements from any witnesses to the accident. These statements should be detailed and specific, outlining what the witness saw and heard. I always advise my clients to get these statements in writing, if possible, and notarized for added credibility.
  • Medical Records: Maintain detailed medical records of all treatment related to the injury. These records should include diagnoses, treatment plans, and any restrictions placed on your activities. Make sure your doctor clearly links the injury to your work activities.
  • Photographs and Videos: If possible, take photographs or videos of the accident scene, the injury itself, and any equipment involved. Visual evidence can be incredibly powerful in demonstrating fault.
  • Company Policies and Procedures: Obtain copies of your employer’s safety policies and procedures. These documents can be used to show whether your employer followed proper safety protocols or whether they were negligent in any way.

Don’t underestimate the power of documentation. The more evidence you can gather to support your claim, the stronger your position will be.

Case Study: Navigating a Contested Fault Claim

Let’s consider a hypothetical case study: Sarah, a home healthcare provider in Augusta, was injured in a car accident while driving between patient visits. Her employer initially denied her workers’ compensation claim, arguing that the accident occurred during her commute and was therefore not work-related. However, Sarah’s attorney successfully argued that her travel between patient visits was an integral part of her job duties, falling under the exception established in Law v. State Farm.

To prove her case, Sarah provided the following evidence:

  • A detailed log of her daily travel schedule, showing the addresses and appointment times of each patient.
  • A copy of her employment contract, which explicitly stated that she was required to travel between patient visits.
  • Witness statements from several of her patients, confirming that she regularly traveled to their homes as part of her job.
  • The police report from the accident, which documented the other driver’s fault in causing the collision.

After presenting this evidence to the SBWC, the administrative law judge ruled in Sarah’s favor, awarding her workers’ compensation benefits, including medical expenses and lost wages. The total settlement was $75,000, covering her medical bills, lost wages for 12 weeks, and a permanent partial disability rating.

Navigating the Workers’ Compensation System

The Georgia workers’ compensation system can be complex and confusing, especially when fault is disputed. The SBWC has resources available to help navigate the process. A link to the SBWC website is provided for your convenience.

Here’s what nobody tells you: insurance companies are often looking to minimize payouts. It’s their job. That’s why it’s crucial to have someone advocating for your rights. I’ve seen countless cases where injured workers were initially denied benefits, only to have their claims approved after seeking legal representation. It’s not about being adversarial; it’s about ensuring that you receive the benefits you are entitled to under the law.

Consider this: are you truly equipped to take on a large insurance company on your own? The complexities of the law, the nuances of evidence gathering, and the negotiation strategies employed by insurance adjusters can be overwhelming. Seeking legal counsel can level the playing field and significantly increase your chances of a successful outcome.

The statute of limitations for filing a workers’ compensation claim in Georgia is generally one year from the date of the accident. However, there are exceptions to this rule, so it’s always best to consult with an attorney as soon as possible after an injury. Don’t delay – your rights may be at stake.

It’s also important to note that your conduct can impact your benefits. Be sure to follow your doctor’s orders and avoid any activities that could jeopardize your recovery.

What should I do immediately after a workplace injury in Augusta?

Report the injury to your employer immediately, seek medical attention, and document everything related to the incident, including witness information and accident details.

Can I choose my own doctor for workers’ compensation treatment in Georgia?

Generally, your employer or their insurance company has the right to select your treating physician. However, there are exceptions, and you may be able to request a change of physician under certain circumstances.

What if my employer denies my workers’ compensation claim?

You have the right to appeal the denial to the State Board of Workers’ Compensation. You should consult with an attorney to understand your rights and options for appealing the decision.

How are workers’ compensation benefits calculated in Georgia?

Weekly benefits are typically calculated as two-thirds of your average weekly wage, subject to certain maximum limits set by the state. Medical expenses are also covered.

What is the difference between workers’ compensation and a personal injury claim?

Workers’ compensation is a no-fault system that provides benefits to employees injured on the job, regardless of who was at fault. A personal injury claim, on the other hand, is a lawsuit filed against a negligent party who caused your injuries. You generally cannot pursue both types of claims for the same injury.

The key takeaway? Don’t navigate the Georgia workers’ compensation system alone, especially when fault is a point of contention. Consult with an experienced attorney in Augusta to understand your rights and ensure you receive the benefits you deserve. The nuances of Law v. State Farm and employer defenses can be tricky, but with the right legal guidance, you can protect your future and secure the compensation you need to recover.

Idris Calloway

Senior Partner NALP Ethics Committee Member, Juris Doctor (JD)

Idris Calloway is a Senior Partner at Sterling & Finch, specializing in complex litigation and legal ethics. With over twelve years of experience, Idris has dedicated his career to upholding the highest standards of legal practice. He is a sought-after speaker on topics ranging from attorney-client privilege to professional responsibility. Idris also serves on the ethics committee for the National Association of Legal Professionals (NALP). Notably, he successfully defended a landmark case against the fictional Veridian Corporation, setting a new precedent for corporate accountability.